United States:
Post-Pandemic Inventory Management
14 December 2023
Foley & Lardner
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent supply chain disruptions
upended supply chains and caused inventory shortages followed by
excess inventory challenges. As companies toil to redesign their
approach to inventory management, a look at related commercial
contracts will also be key. Commercial contract provisions should
match the business strategies of the supply chain players, so that
the contractual parties agree to any needed volume requirement,
safety stock, bailment, and service level agreement provisions
(just to name a few).
It's March 2020. Store shelves sit empty, without any
toilet paper or cleaning supplies in sight. Tablets and electronic
devices are out of stock. Consumers are clamoring for the basics
they need to suddenly work and learn from home and live under
quarantine. Meanwhile, on Zoom calls and in email threads, company
leaders around the world are racing to put in giant orders with
their suppliers to speed up supply-chain lags and get products to
customers. In the supply-and-demand equation, demand seems
infinite.
Now, three-plus years later, we're seeing the stark
aftereffects of that spike in demand. After the race to order key
components and manufacture products, suppliers are left with
mountains of excess inventory as growth has slowed to normal
levels.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Corporate/Commercial Law from United States
Corporate Transparency Act Update
Shulman Rogers
With the arrival of spring and the first set of Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) filing deadlines behind us, it is a good time for an update on lessons learned from the initial filings.
Compliance Isn't The Only 'AI Washing' Risk
Bracewell
Companies are rapidly adopting artificial intelligence technologies, and both regulators and private plaintiffs have set their sights on "AI washing," where businesses tout AI capabilities that do not exist.