United States:
Slights Addresses Third-Party Direct Actions By Judgment Holders Against An Insurer
04 April 2022
Cozen O'Connor
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Barry Klayman and Mark Felger, writing in the Delaware
Business Court Insider, review a recent decision in the
Superior Court of Delaware that addresses whether a third party may
bring a direct action against an insurer for coverage on a theory
of subrogation when equitable subrogation does not apply and the
right cannot be traced to a statute or contract. The vice
chancellor, sitting by designation in Superior Court, found the law
to be uncertain, but determined it was unnecessary to clarify the
law because the plaintiffs could not satisfy the requirements for
subrogation to apply.
To read the article, click here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Insurance from United States
IPAS Brewing In Illinois
Dickinson Wright PLLC
The Chicago area has numerous craft breweries, many of whom make amazing India pale ales, or IPAs.
Misrepresentation In Application Coverage Update
Plunkett & Cooney
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the state's Superior Court ruling that Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) was not entitled to a declaratory judgment that Zurich had no duty to defend ...
DOL Final Fiduciary Rule Released
Groom Law Group
On April 23, 2024, the Department of Labor ("DOL") released its new fiduciary investment advice definition in a package titled the "Retirement Security Rule" (the "2024 Package").