Get Out Your Maps: The Peach State Requires Geographic Limitations On Promises Not To Solicit Employees

BI
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
Contributor
With 450 attorneys and government relations professionals across 15 offices, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney provides progressive legal, business, regulatory and government relations advice to protect, defend and advance our clients’ businesses. We service a wide range of clients, with deep experience in the finance, energy, healthcare and life sciences industries.
The Georgia Court of Appeals recently limited Georgia employers' ability to enforce employee non-solicitation agreements.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently limited Georgia employers' ability to enforce employee non-solicitation agreements. In North American Senior Benefits, LLC v. Wimmer, No. A23A0162, 2023 WL 3963931 (Ga. Ct. App. June 13, 2023), the Court held that employee non-solicitation provisions must include a geographic limitation to be enforceable. Of course, many (if not most) such provisions prohibit the solicitation of any employees; they rarely limit themselves to particular lines on a map.

The Court held that the requirements outlined in Georgia's Restrictive Covenants Act (RCA), which requires any restriction to be reasonable in time, geographic area, and scope of prohibited activities, apply to restrictive covenants that prohibit solicitation of employees. Although the Court recognized that Georgia law does carve out certain exceptions for post-employment restrictive covenants that prohibit solicitation of an employer's customers and trade secrets, it held that these carve-outs do not apply to employee non-solicitation agreements. Importantly, the Court also declined the invitation to "blue-pencil" or modify the restrictive covenant to cure the lack of a geographic limitation. Rather, it affirmed the lower court's holding that such an approach would "add a material term instead of simply narrowing or severing impermissible language or terms."

Although it is possible that the Georgia Supreme Court could overrule this decision or that the Georgia Legislature will amend the RCA to address the issue identified in Wimmer, unless and until that occurs, employers with a presence in Georgia should ensure that all new employment agreements with employee non-solicitation agreements have both a reasonable time and geographic limitation. Given the uncertainty, Georgia employers should also consider revising their existing non-solicitation of employee provisions to include appropriate geographic limitations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Get Out Your Maps: The Peach State Requires Geographic Limitations On Promises Not To Solicit Employees

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
With 450 attorneys and government relations professionals across 15 offices, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney provides progressive legal, business, regulatory and government relations advice to protect, defend and advance our clients’ businesses. We service a wide range of clients, with deep experience in the finance, energy, healthcare and life sciences industries.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More