On February 21, 2023, The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a decision (McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023)), in which it held that confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements unlawfully violate employees' rights to engage in protected concerted activity. In doing so, the NLRB has broadly concluded that all such clauses restrict employees' rights to speak about wages, hours, and other such terms of employment.
Importantly, the NLRB's holding is prospective in nature in that it will not impact severance agreements entered into prior to the date of the decision although will affect future severance agreements. Notably, the NLRB decision only applies to employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act, or non-supervisory employees. Therefore, the impact of the decision is limited.
Whether the decision will ultimately withstand scrutiny by the federal courts remains to be seen at this time. Considering severance is not a right for most employees, the ability by employers to impose terms in exchange for providing severance pay is a fundamental principle behind such agreements. In spite of the decision, employers may continue utilizing confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses within severance agreements with supervisory employees (who are not covered by the NLRA). As to non-supervisory employees, employers should use caution when drafting severance agreements for such employees until further notice.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.