ARTICLE
16 November 2021

NLRB Asserts Unionized Employers Must Bargain Over The Implementation Of OSHA's Emergency Temporary Standard

RB
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.

Contributor

Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren is a full-service, business-oriented law firm with offices in Milwaukee, Madison, Waukesha and Wausau, Wisconsin; Chicago and Rockford, Illinois; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Denver, Colorado; and Phoenix, Arizona. With nearly 200 lawyers, the firm serves clients throughout the United States and internationally with a combination of legal advice, industry understanding and superior client service.
Following OSHA's November 5, 2021, publication of its Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) on COVID-19 vaccination and testing, unionized employers have asked what bargaining obligations they may have with respect to implementing the ETS.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Following OSHA's November 5, 2021, publication of its Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) on COVID-19 vaccination and testing, unionized employers have asked what bargaining obligations they may have with respect to implementing the ETS. On November 10, 2021, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) responded to such inquiries by issuing a short memorandum, Memorandum OM 22-03, authored by its Acting Associate General Counsel.

The memorandum's key principle is that whenever a unionized employer has some discretion in implementing a particular ETS requirement, the employer may not act unilaterally. In other words, whenever the ETS provides an employer with choices regarding implementation, the NLRB believes decisional bargaining is required. The NLRB asserts that such bargaining is required because the ETS affects terms and conditions of employment-including, potentially, a bargaining unit member's continued employment.

The NLRB also believes that even when a particular ETS requirement gives an employer no discretion in implementing that requirement, the employer is nonetheless obligated to bargain over the effects of the implementation. The memorandum adds that "[w]hether a covered employer may implement a mandatory regulation prior to a valid impasse or agreement when bargaining over effects will depend on the facts of any given situation."

Large, unionized employers should also take note of paragraph, 2.F. of OSHA's "Frequently Asked Questions." That paragraph, titled "How will the ETS apply to unionized workplaces?," states that the ETS does not displace labor contract provisions that exceed ETS requirements, nor does the ETS prohibit employers and unions from agreeing to implement additional measures aimed at safeguarding the workforce from COVID-19.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More