ARTICLE
6 October 2020

Hawaii Expands Scope Of Off-Limits Convictions For Employment Purposes

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
In 1998, Hawaii became the first state to "ban the box," prohibiting a private employer from inquiring about a job applicant's criminal history until the employer has made a conditional offer of...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Seyfarth Synopsis: On September 15, 2020, Hawaii Governor David Y. Ige signed Senate Bill 051, which narrows the scope of convictions that employers can use for hiring and other employment-related decisions. The new law is effective immediately.

In 1998, Hawaii became the first state to "ban the box," prohibiting a private employer from inquiring about a job applicant's criminal history until the employer has made a conditional offer of employment. Up until now, the state also made it unlawful for an employer to consider an applicant or employee's conviction record unless the record was less than 10 years old, excluding periods of incarceration. And, those records can only disqualify a person from employment if the employer can show the record has a "rational relationship" to the duties and responsibilities of the position in question.

This year, however, the state legislature noted that this 10-year lookback period "may continue to facilitate employment discrimination against individuals who have a criminal history, but who have long since paid their debt to society and pose little to no risk to an employer or the public." Thus, the legislature determined it appropriate to shorten the 10-year lookback period to "reduce unnecessary employment discrimination against individuals with old and relatively minor conviction records, in furtherance of economic self-sufficiency, and to reduce crime and recidivism rates."

To this end, effective September 15, 2020, employers in Hawaii now may only consider felony convictions that occurred in the most recent seven years and misdemeanor convictions that occurred in the most recent five years (both excluding any periods of incarceration). The law still requires employers to allow applicants or employees to present documentary evidence of their date of release from incarceration if they disagree with the period of incarceration reported to the employer. Importantly, the record still must bear a "rational relationship" to the job in question in order to be disqualifying.

The law contains numerous exceptions, including for certain schools, healthcare institutions, financial institutions, insurance institutions, and many others.

Employers located in Hawaii should ensure that their screening and other hiring practices comply with the amended law immediately. Employers also should continue to be mindful of other laws regulating criminal records checks and screening policies, including state and local employment and ban-the-box laws and the growing body of laws restricting employer use of credit reports and other credit history information in hiring and other employment decisions. Moreover, given that we continue to see class actions filed against employers over the Fair Credit Reporting Act's hyper-technical requirements, employers also would be well-advised to review and adit their disclosure and authorization forms and stay abreast of legal updates in this area of the law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More