ARTICLE
1 February 2023

SEC Re Proposes Conflict Of Interest Rule For Asset Backed Securities

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has issued proposed Rule 192 pursuant to Section 27B of the Securities Act of 1933.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has issued proposed Rule 192 pursuant to Section 27B of the Securities Act of 1933. Section 27B requires the SEC to issue rules for the purpose of implementing that section's prohibition against a securitization participant's entering into a transaction that would involve or result in a material conflict of interest with any investor.
  • General Rule. Proposed Rule 192 prohibits a "securitization participant" from directly or indirectly engaging in any transaction that would involve or result in a "material conflict of interest" between the securitization participant and an investor.
  • Exceptions. Rule 192 contains exceptions for (1) risk-mitigating hedging activities, (2) liquidity commitments and (3) bona-fide market making activities.
  • Scope. Rule 192 applies to "asset-backed securities" as defined by section 3(a)(79) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and also includes synthetic and hybrid cash and synthetic ABS (neither of which terms are defined in Proposed Rule 192 or elsewhere under applicable securities laws).
  • Anti-Circumvention. Proposed Rule 192 includes a broad "anti-circumvention" provision that prohibits a securitization participant from engaging in any other transaction that circumvents the prohibition on transactions that create a material conflict of interest.
  • Deadline for Comments. Comments are due by March 27, 2023, or 30 days following publication of the proposing release in theFederal Register, whichever period is longer.
  • Compliance Date. The proposing release does not specify a compliance date. Unless the adopting release provides otherwise, Rule 192 will become effective upon the issuance of the final rule.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
1 February 2023

SEC Re Proposes Conflict Of Interest Rule For Asset Backed Securities

United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More