Worldwide:
Navigating Disruption In The Bond Market
31 March 2022
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
As global economies emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, bond
issuers continue to face headwinds, not least arising from
Russia's recent invasion of Ukraine. Given the absence of
maintenance financial covenants (other than perhaps a springing
leverage covenant – see below), bond issuers with upcoming
maturities and/or liquidity constraints are a focus, with some
downward pressure on secondary pricing. This primer summarises
certain recurring issues for consideration.
Capital Structure & Priority
(1) What is the capital structure, ranking and collateral
package of the different instruments?
(2) Is collateral common across all debt instruments?
(3) If a super senior revolving facility
(ssRCF) is present, is it super senior
only to the proceeds of enforcement of shared security?
(4) If the ssRCF contains a single leverage covenant, is it
springing, and can it be relied upon beyond ssRCF lenders?
|
Restricted vs Unrestricted Group
What is the breakdown between the EBITDA and assets of the
restricted group vs. the unrestricted subsidiaries
(URS)?
Compare this:
- against the level at issuance;
- over time to analyse whether it has used up restricted payment
(RP) capacity; and
- against remaining RP capacity.
|
Credit Support. What is the guarantee and security package and
is it worth anything?
- Single Point of Enforcement? Should sit through structural
share security in a creditor-friendly jurisdiction, with most of
the restricted group being guarantors of the bonds, but this should
be carefully analysed.
- How significant are the unencumbered assets within and outside
the Restricted Group? Link this to the priming lien risk (see
below), to assess if it arises in bankruptcy scenarios or whether
it is more broad.
- Different jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of
guarantees. Note also the more limited set of debt incurrence and
lien permissions applying to non-guarantor restricted subsidiaries
(NGRS) to incur structurally senior indebtedness.
- Intercreditor Restrictions. Check constraints on enforcing the
key structural security including contractual restrictions under
intercreditor arrangements, including value protection requirements
and release provisions.
|
Priming / Dilution
Capacity
- What is the aggregate capacity under ratio-based and other debt
incurrence permissions?
- What is the most recent financial information on which to make
the assessment?
Priming
- Can new debt rank in priority to the existing bonds, either
through being borrowed by an URS or NGRS, on an earlier maturity
basis or through use of a specific debt / lien basket?
Other sources of liquidity
- Can baskets be created or inflated in combination with an
equity injection (Contribution
Indebtedness capacity)?
- Are sale and leaseback or receivables factoring baskets
available as a source of liquidity?
- Are there ways in which liquidity can be raised by disposing of
URS or borrowing against assets in URS?
|
Value Leakage
- What is the aggregate capacity under ratio-based and other RP
permissions, including by way of investment outside of the
restricted group and permitted payments to owners / other third
parties?
- Where a Contribution Indebtedness basket is present, can the
proceeds be paid back out as a permitted payment?
- Can the proceeds of asset sales be used to make permitted
payments/investments and circumvent the asset sales
waterfall?
- Can RP capacity, which may have built up under the Available
Amount (or similar concepts), be used to increase borrowing
capacity?
- How much of the business is held in URS and what is the ability
to dispose of or otherwise deal with those URS and transfer further
value into them (i.e. J-Crew)? Are J-Crew blockers etc. in
place?
|
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Finance and Banking from Worldwide
Asset Recovery Comparative Guide
Bird & Bird
Asset Recovery Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of UK, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
Q&A: Safe Harbours For VASPs - Part 1
Ogier
Asian Legal Business was keen to hear from our experts on how this will allow virtual asset services providers (VASPs) to anchor in theses jurisdictions, despite increased regulatory burdens...
Q&A: Safe Harbours For VASPs - Part 2
Ogier
In 2023, Jersey and the British Virgin Islands passed legislation indicating they were welcoming virtual asset service providers, joining the likes of the Cayman Islands...
CRD VI And Its Impact On Lending Into Europe
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
December 2023 saw the publication by the EU of the near-final version of its ‘Banking Package' that makes significant changes to the Capital Requirements Directive known as ‘CRD VI'.
Financial Promotion Exemptions – UK Government U-Turn
Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
In response to criticism, the UK Government announced in the 2024 Spring Budget that recent changes to the financial promotion exemptions eligibility criteria would be partially reversed from 27 March 2024.