Voluntary Divisional Applications In Mexico

O
OLIVARES

Contributor

Our mission is to provide innovative solutions and highly specialized legal advice for clients facing the most complicated legal and business challenges in Mexico. OLIVARES is continuously at the forefront of new practice areas concerning copyright, litigation, regulatory, anti-counterfeiting, plant varieties, domain names, digital rights, and internet-related matters, and the firm has been responsible for precedent-setting decisions in patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Our firm is committed to developing the strongest group of legal professionals to manage the level of complexity and interdisciplinary orientation that clients require. During the first decade of the 21st century, the team successfully led efforts to reshape IP laws and change regulatory authorizations procedures in Mexico, not only through thought leadership and lobbying efforts, but the firm has also won several landmark and precedent-setting cases at the Mexican Federal and Supreme Courts levels, including in constitutional matters.
Voluntary divisional applications are a good strategy for obtaining protection for specific embodiments of an invention that were not granted in a certain parent case and that are of commercial interest for the applicant.
Mexico Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Voluntary divisional applications are a good strategy for obtaining protection for specific embodiments of an invention that were not granted in a certain parent case and that are of commercial interest for the applicant. In this respect, it is important to clarify that the Mexican Industrial Property Law does not have a specific provision that contemplates the possibility of filing voluntary divisional applications. However, in practice, Mexican Examiners accept the filing of voluntary divisional applications at any time during the prosecution of the parent application and before the payment of the final fees. The legal support for this criteria lies in article 4-G (2) of the Paris Convention Treaty which establishes that the applicant has the opportunity of voluntarily dividing a patent application and preserve as the date of each divisional application the date of the initial application and the benefit of the right of priority, if any. In this sense, it is important to contemplate that if the applicant has not decided which matter he wishes to pursue in said voluntary divisional application, it is possible to file the original PCT set of claims in said divisional and, afterwards, once he has defined the matter he seeks to pursue, he can file said matter by means of a voluntary amendment before the issuance of the first office action. Typically, the first office action for a divisional application issues about 8 to 14 months after the filing date of said divisional and thus, the applicant has plenty of enough time to define the matter they seek to pursue in said voluntary divisional application. Also, especially in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical/Biotech cases, when drafting the claims for a voluntary divisional application, it is necessary to avoid any type of overlapping matter with that of the parent case in order to avoid a future double patenting objection.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More