ARTICLE
19 March 2019

Special Allowances Under The EPF Act Need To Be Special

KC
Kochhar & Co.

Contributor

With more than 200 lawyers, Kochhar & Co. is one of the leading and largest corporate law firms in India (""Firm”) . Kochhar & Co. enjoys the distinction of being the only law firm with a full-service presence in the six (6) prominent cities of India namely: New Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Gurgaon and Hyderabad and four (4) overseas offices: Dubai, Singapore, Atlanta, Jeddah. The Firm offers a wide range of legal services in the area of Corporate & Commercial Laws, Dispute Resolution, Tax and Intellectual Property (IPR) and specializes in representing major foreign corporations with diverse business interests in India.
On February 28, 2019, the Supreme Court of India passed a landmark order on whether special allowances fall within the scope and meaning of "basic wages" under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
India Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On February 28, 2019, the Supreme Court of India passed a landmark order on whether special allowances fall within the scope and meaning of "basic wages" under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (the "EPF Act"). Under the EPF Act, provident fund contributions of 12% need to be paid by an employer and employee on the employee's basic wages, dearness allowance and any retaining allowance. The definition of basic wages excluded specific categories including overtime allowance, house rent allowance, bonus and the category of "any other allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employment or work done in such employment". Companies typically treat the said carve-out as a 'special allowance', which is not subject to provident fund contributions. While structuring the salary components, special allowance was often 30-40% of an employee's salary, on which they would not remit provident fund contributions.

Through this Supreme Court order, allowances which are universally and ordinarily paid to all employees across the board have to be held as basic wages rather than special allowances. Allowances which are paid out to an employee as an incentive or for work performed beyond the regular work requirement can be excluded from the scope of basic wages, not otherwise. All universal allowances thus now need to be treated as part of "basic wages" and subject to provident fund contributions.

This issue had come up several times previously before the courts, including the Supreme Court and the new order makes it effectively clear that an employer cannot create an allowance structure from an employee's compensation just to avoid paying the required provident fund contributions.

While the Employees Provident Funds Organisation has long maintained that special allowances are part of the basic wages and subject to provident fund contributions, several companies had challenged this issue. With the current Supreme Court order, employers should ensure that they are making provident fund contributions on the required components of basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance under the EPF Act and are excluding only statutorily permitted allowances such as house rent allowance, overtime allowance or a bonus.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More