Several national pharmaceutical distributors and Ohio cities have filed opening briefs in their Sixth Circuit challenge to Judge Polster's novel "negotiation class" certification order. As this blog covered back in November, the court of appeals (Guy, Griffin, Kethledge) granted interlocutory review of the negotiation procedure.
According to the distributors, the class creates conflicts of interest between plaintiffs' attorneys participating in both bellwether trials and the negotiation class. And according to the dissenting cities which challenged the order, the intricate certification order puts too much financial pressure on municipalities to settle.
Appellees' bottomside briefs are due late next month. If the appeal (unlike the first round of bellwether trials) culminates in a decision, the Sixth Circuit should be the first court to review one of the most novel innovations in civil procedure since, say, the very FRCP 23 class-cert rules that appellants contend bar Judge Polster's invention.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.