ARTICLE
30 March 2017

New York District Court Flushes Nationwide Class, Permits New York Classes To Go Forward

As such, the court limited its certification to three New York classes, two in the present case and one in a related case.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In three related actions before the Eastern District of New York, consumer plaintiffs who purchased moist toilet wipes manufactured and produced by Kimberly-Clark and sold by Costco alleged that defendants mislabeled the wipes as "flushable." The court denied certification of a nationwide class, but did certify three New York class actions all involving New York law and New York purchases but different defendants and a different product.

The court declined to certify the nationwide class because the named plaintiff failed to demonstrate the "financial or other capacity to adequately represent a national class of consumers." The court based this decision on plaintiff's "reluctance to conduct a scientific survey of consumers to determine a reasonable consumer's understanding of the term 'flushable'" and that "conducting such a survey on a national scale would be costly." The court further found limiting certification to New York classes appropriate because "the events underlying [plaintiff's] claim took place in New York and discovery has largely been confined to New York." As such, the court limited its certification to three New York classes, two in the present case and one in a related case.

Kurtz v. Kimberly–Clark Corp., No. 14–CV–1142 (E.D.N.Y Feb. 27, 2017).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More