Bayer Given A Headache By Trial Court Decision In FLANAX US Trademark Dispute

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
On February 6, 2015, a US District Court issued a ruling which underscores the territorial nature of trademark rights and the need to seek formal protection for your marks where possible in all countries of interest.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On February 6, 2015, a US District Court issued a ruling which underscores the territorial nature of trademark rights and the need to seek formal protection for your marks where possible in all countries of interest. The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas reversed the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. Belmora LLC which held that the Paris Convention does not grant trademark rights that are protectable under certain Sections of the United States Trademark Statute (the Lanham Act). The District Court's decision allows Belmora LLC's US trademark registration for FLANAX to stand even though Bayer holds trademark protection for FLANAX for a very similar product. Bayer's registration of FLANAX is in Mexico and its similar product in the US is marketed under the brand Aleve. Read more analysis of this important decision on the Copyright & Trademark Matters blog.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Bayer Given A Headache By Trial Court Decision In FLANAX US Trademark Dispute

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More