United States Supreme Court Declares Open Tax Season On On-line Retailers

MM
McLane Middleton, Professional Association

Contributor

Founded in 1919, McLane Middleton, Professional Association has been committed to serving their clients, community and colleagues for over 100 years.  They are one of New England’s premier full-service law firms with offices in Woburn and Boston, Massachusetts and Manchester, Concord and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. 
In a long awaited decision reversing 26 years of existing precedent, on June 21st the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., that states and other taxing jurisdictions...
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a long awaited decision reversing 26 years of existing precedent, on June 21st the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota  v. Wayfair, Inc., that states and other taxing jurisdictions could require out of state retailers to collect sales tax on online sales even though the retailers had no physical presence in the taxing jurisdiction.

The South Dakota Legislature enacted a law requiring out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales tax "as if the seller had a physical presence in the State." The law covers sellers that, on an annual basis, deliver more than $100,000 of goods or services into the State or engage in 200 or more separate transactions for the delivery of goods or services into the State.  Wayfair and other large online retailers with no employees or real estate in South Dakota, filed suit seeking a declaration that the law's requirements to register for licenses to collect and remit sales tax were un­constitutional under existing Supreme Court decisions.

The Supreme Court decision in favor of South Dakota is monumental, as prior Supreme Court decisions had effectively prevented states (and other taxing jurisdictions) from collecting any sales tax on retail purchases made over the Internet or other e-Commerce route unless the seller had a physical presence in the state.  In the past several years, multiple states have adopted laws seeking to circumvent the physical presence requirement.  While many of these laws were challenged in court, prior to accepting the Wayfair case, the Supreme Court had refused to hear any case regarding a law challenging the physical presence requirement.

In anticipation of the Supreme Court ruling in Wayfair, numerous states have enacted new laws designed to require on-line retailers to collect sales tax.  With the Wayfair decision validating South Dakota's law, we expect many additional states will adopt laws using volume of sales as a trigger to require sales tax collection.

The decision presents enormous compliance costs for businesses that sell remotely.  There are approximately 40 states and 10,000 sales tax jurisdictions in the United States.  The laws as to what is taxable and who must collect vary among the jurisdictions.  The multiplicity of taxing jurisdictions, frequent changes in sales tax laws, and lack of consistency in the laws will require remote sellers to devote significant time to sales tax compliance.  More significantly, it has been our experience that jurisdictions will seek to collect tax on sales as of effective date of legislation eliminating the physical presence requirement.  In light of the decision in Wayfair, businesses selling in jurisdictions with statutes similar to South Dakota can expect demands for sales tax owed for past years.

We recommend businesses selling on-line immediately begin to assess their sales tax compliance obligations in light of the Supreme Court's decision that dramatically changes the collection obligation rules for on-line sellers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More