ARTICLE
12 September 2019

SEC Announces Changes To Administration Of Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests

AP
Arnold & Porter

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
On September 6, 2019, the SEC announced changes to how it will respond to companies that seek to exclude shareholder proposals from their proxy statements under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 6, 2019, the SEC announced changes to how it will respond to companies that seek to exclude shareholder proposals from their proxy statements under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8. Therehas been no change in the requirement that a company seeking to exclude a shareholder proposal from its proxy statement notify the SEC that it intends to do so (and provide a copy of that notification to the shareholder who submitted the proposal). The SEC staff will also continue to inform the proponent and the company that it concurs, disagrees or declines to state a view with respect to the company’s asserted basis for exclusion. However, commencing with the 2019-2020 shareholder proposal season, the staff may respond orally (instead of in writing) to some requests to exclude shareholder proposals; written responses will be issued if the staff believes it would provide value, such as more broadly applicable guidance about complying with Rule 14a-8. The SEC announcement noted that the staff’s declining to state a view as to whether a proposal may be excluded should not be interpreted as an indication that the proposal must be included. If the staff declines to express a view, the company may determine to exclude the proposal, recognizing that the proponent may challenge that decision in court under Rule 14a-8.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More