ARTICLE
4 February 2020

SEC Updates Guidance On Confidential Treatment Applications

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
On 19 December 2019, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance published an update to its guidance with respect to the SEC's procedures for confidential treatment applications.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 19 December 2019, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance published an update to its guidance with respect to the SEC's procedures for confidential treatment applications. In April 2019, the SEC adopted new rules amending Regulation S-K to allow filers to redact confidential information from most exhibits to their filings without submitting a request for confidential treatment, provided that the redacted information is not material and that public disclosure would likely cause competitive harm. Although most filers now rely on those new provisions, the Division of Corporation Finance has updated its guidance regarding the "classic" procedure involving confidential treatment applications. Indeed, for certain filings, such as Schedule 13D or filings whose exhibit requirements are set out in Item 1016 of Regulation M-A, the confidential treatment application remains the only available method to protect private information in filed exhibits.

Under the updated guidance, companies must file the required exhibit and omit confidential information, and then separately provide the SEC with an unredacted copy of the document identifying the confidential information. They must also identify the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption on which they are relying to object to public disclosure of the redacted information, explain why the information is not necessary to protect investors and justify the time period of the confidential treatment. According to the guidance, the SEC staff may request an amendment with more circumscribed omissions and an amended application if the applicant omits information beyond what it customarily and actually treats as private or confidential, and may also request additional information, in particular to assess the impact of the proposed omissions.

The guidance specifically refers to the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Food Marketing Institute v Argus Leader Media, which addresses the definition of "confidential" in the context of the FOIA exemption for "commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More