ARTICLE
9 August 2017

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Selective Reverse Appeals Are Unconstitutional

AG
Archer & Greiner P.C.

Contributor

Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Valley Forge Towers decision provides much needed guidance on enforcing constitutional boundaries where taxing districts employ discriminatory and unfair appeal policy.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled in favor of taxpayers, finding a valid claim that Upper Merion Area School District real estate assessment appeal policy violates the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Valley Forge Towers Apartments et al. v. Upper Merion Area School District, No. 49 MAP 2016.

The Valley Forge Towers appeal raises the question of whether the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution permits taxing districts from selectively appealing the assessments of commercial properties, while choosing not to appeal the assessments of other types of property – most notably, single-family residential homes – many of which are under-assessed by a greater percentage. The Supreme Court ruled that such appeals violate the Uniformity Clause and are not permitted. It reversed lower court dismissals of the taxpayer's complaint and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Valley Forge Towers decision provides much needed guidance on enforcing constitutional boundaries where taxing districts employ discriminatory and unfair appeal policy.

Taxing district "spot" appeals can significantly impact your property taxes. Taxpayers in Pennsylvania should take the necessary steps to protect their rights to uniformity in assessment, and equality and fairness in taxation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
9 August 2017

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Selective Reverse Appeals Are Unconstitutional

United States Tax

Contributor

Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More