ARTICLE
16 January 2020

Key Patent Decisions Of 2019

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
This White Paper summarizes and explains some of the most significant patent law decisions of 2019.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In another noteworthy year for patent law, the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit issued several decisions that altered the patent landscape, including three Supreme Court decisions. The topics of the key cases included whether "secret sales" qualify as prior art, standing to appeal an inter partes review ("IPR") decision, whether federal agencies can petition for IPR, sovereign immunity, and whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") can recover attorneys' fees.

This White Paper summarizes and explains some of the most significant patent law decisions of 2019. Each of these decisions has meaningful implications for patent owners, defendants, and patent practitioners alike.

Read the full White Paper.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More