Lexmark v. Impression: Federal Circuit Holds That Restricted Sales And Foreign Sales Do Not Exhaust Patent Rights

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
In Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., the en banc Federal Circuit held that sale of an article under clearly communicated and otherwise lawful restrictions on use and resale avoids patent exhaustion.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., the en banc Federal Circuit held that (1) the sale of an article under clearly communicated and otherwise lawful restrictions on use and resale avoids patent exhaustion and preserves the patentee's rights to pursue infringement remedies both against the buyer and downstream buyers with knowledge of the restrictions, and (2) a patentee's or licensee's foreign sales of a patented article do not exhaust the U.S. patent rights in the article sold, even if no reservation of those rights accompanies the sale. The 10-2 decision comes as a surprise to many observers, at least as to its restricted sales holding, as it creates some tension with recent Supreme Court authority on intellectual property exhaustion.

Of particular interest to ITC watchers, the decision re-affirmed the Federal Circuit's opinion in Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Comm'n, 264 F.3d 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2001), finding that U.S. patent rights are exhausted only by a first sale in the United States, not by sales abroad.

Read the client alert on mofo.com.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Lexmark v. Impression: Federal Circuit Holds That Restricted Sales And Foreign Sales Do Not Exhaust Patent Rights

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More