ARTICLE
26 August 2015

Is One APJ Enough For Post Grant Institution Decisions?

RS
Reed Smith

Contributor

A pilot program proposed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office would have a single Administrative Patent Judge (APJ).
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A pilot program proposed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office would have a single Administrative Patent Judge (APJ), as opposed to a panel of three, decide whether to institute trial in a post grant patent proceeding, such as an inter partes review. The full panel would adjudicate the trial if it is instituted. The pilot would last 3-6 months. The USPTO is requesting comments on the proposed pilot program.

While this procedure, if permanently adopted, could reduce the overall work-load on the APJs, it would reduce the resources available for determining if trial is to be instituted. Combined with proposed rules which allow the patent owner to present testimonial evidence in the Patent Owner's Response, and thus increase the volume and complexity of the record, this would seem to place a great burden on a single APJ deciding whether to institute trial. If adopted, more than ever, Petitioner's would have to present a clear and concise rationale for instituting a trial.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More