Bristol-Myers Squibb Files Patent Infringement Complaint Against AstraZeneca Regarding Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Product

GP
Goodwin Procter LLP

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
On April 25, 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb ("BMS") filed a complaint in the District of Delaware against AstraZeneca related to AstraZeneca's anti-PD-L1 antibody product, IMFINZI (durvalumab)...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On April 25, 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb ("BMS") filed a complaint in the District of Delaware against AstraZeneca related to AstraZeneca's anti-PD-L1 antibody product, IMFINZI (durvalumab), alleging willful infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,402,899 ("the '899 patent"). BMS alleges that the '899 patent covers "Nobel Prize winning methods of treating cancer" by using "an antibody to inhibit the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 to treat cancer in patients." BMS further alleges that its OPDIVO (nivolumab) is the first antibody targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway that has been approved anywhere in the world for cancer treatment. BMS seeks a judgment of infringement of the '899 patent, damages, and an award of attorneys' fee and costs due to alleged willful infringement.

This is the second case that BMS has filed against AstraZeneca alleging infringement of the '899 patent. In July 2017, BMS filed a complaint against AstraZeneca, also alleging that use of AstraZeneca's IMFINZI (durvalumab) infringes claims of the '899 patent. See C.A. No. 1:17-01028 (D. Del.). That case was dismissed without prejudice in June 2019, based on a stipulation of the parties in view of an inventorship dispute raised in a related case. Specifically, in a related case in the District of Massachusetts (15-cv-13443), the court ordered that Dr. Gordon Freeman (Dana Farber Cancer Institute) and Dr. Clive Wood (Genetics Institute) are additional co-inventors of the '899 patent. In July 2020, the Federal Circuit affirmed the inventorship determination.

Stay tuned to Big Molecule Watch for further developments with this case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Files Patent Infringement Complaint Against AstraZeneca Regarding Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Product

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

At Goodwin, we partner with our clients to practice law with integrity, ingenuity, agility, and ambition. Our 1,600 lawyers across the United States, Europe, and Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences, real estate, private equity, and financial industries. Our unique combination of deep experience serving both the innovators and investors in a rapidly changing, technology-driven economy sets us apart.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More