IPR, CBM, And PGR Statistics For Final Written Decisions Issued In April And May 2021

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued 34 IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions in April, including decisions following remands from the Federal Circuit, cancelling 230 (69.49%)...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued 34 IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions in April, including decisions following remands from the Federal Circuit, cancelling 230 (69.49%) instituted claims while maintaining the patentability of 101 (30.51%) instituted claims.  Patent owners did not concede any instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer in cases reaching a final decision.  For comparison, the cumulative average rate of instituted claims cancelled in IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions is about 73%.

1090348a.jpg

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 17 (50%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 8 (23.53%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 9 (26.47%) decisions.  A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision. 

1090348b.jpg

In May, the PTAB issued 18 IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions, cancelling 198 (76.15%) instituted claims while maintaining the patentability of 62 (23.85%) instituted claims.  Patent owners again did not concede any claims through motions to amend or disclaimer in cases reaching a final decision. 

1090348c.jpg

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 13 (72.22%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 4 (22.22%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 1 (5.56%) decision. 

1090348d.jpg

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

1090348e.jpg

More detailed cumulative statistics on the Board's IPR, CBM, and PGR decisions, updated through May 31, 2021, are available here on the At the PTAB Blog. 

Statistics regarding the outcome of appeals to the Federal Circuit are available here.

Numbers of final written decisions by technology center and instituted claim survival rates by technology center are available here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

IPR, CBM, And PGR Statistics For Final Written Decisions Issued In April And May 2021

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More