SCOTUS Requires USPTO Director Discretion To Review PTAB Decisions

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In United States v. Arthrex, the Supreme Court declined to adopt the Federal Circuit's severance of tenure protection for Administrative Patent Judges to cure an Appointments
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In United States v. Arthrex, the Supreme Court declined to adopt the Federal Circuit's severance of tenure protection for Administrative Patent Judges to cure an Appointments Clause violation, and it instead held that the Director must have discretionary review of Administrative Patent Judge decisions.  Finnegan's At the PTAB Blog explains the details of the decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

SCOTUS Requires USPTO Director Discretion To Review PTAB Decisions

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More