Listen to Audio
Day 2's Order of Play was:
Plaintiff's case-in-chief
- David R. Bearden, Inventor of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,373
- Thomas Conte, Ph.D., Infringement Expert
During day two, the parties continued to pound their themes. Through the direct testimony of an inventor and its infringement expert, VLSI told the jury that the patented technologies were game changing and that Intel uses them to significantly improve speed and reduce power consumption. Intel through its cross-examinations told the jury the opposite—that these patents represent stale technology and neither Intel nor its former owners ever used them in a modern microprocessor.
To learn more about Day 2, please listen to DaWanna McCray and Danielle Williams' interview with Mike Tomasulo, who is in Waco for the trial.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.