ARTICLE
11 January 2021

Privilege Waiver And Good Faith Reliance On Non-Privileged Information

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Richard Hung and Yuqing Cui authored an article for the Daily Journal examining the case of Brown v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Richard Hung and Yuqing Cui authored an article for the Daily Journal examining the case of Brown v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. to discuss how an accused infringer may rebut a finding of willful patent infringement by asserting a good faith belief of non-infringement.

"Although the case law continues to develop, a party considering the good faith defense not in reliance of counsel's advice should keep Brown in mind when evaluating the potential waiver issue," the authors wrote. "Especially in the patent context, extending Brown could result in a broad waiver that captures a party's communications with counsel, even if not relied upon."

Read the full article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More