ARTICLE
8 February 2019

The Nickel Report: Texas Supreme Court Holds Anadarko's $100M Deepwater Horizon Defense Costs Are Not Subject To Joint Venture Liability Limits

Reversing a Texas Court of Appeals decision that allowed Anadarko's Lloyd's of London excess insurers to escape coverage for more than $100 million in defense costs incurred in connection with claims from the Deepwater Horizon well blowout
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Reversing a Texas Court of Appeals decision that allowed Anadarko's Lloyd's of London excess insurers to escape coverage for more than $100 million in defense costs incurred in connection with claims from the Deepwater Horizon well blowout, the Supreme Court of Texas held that the insurers' obligations to pay defense costs under an "energy package" liability policy are not capped by a joint venture coverage limit for "liability" insured.  Anadarko Petroleum Corp. et al. v. Houston Casualty Co. et al., No. 16-1013 (Tex. Jan. 25, 2019).

For the full report, visit the Hunton Andrews Kurth's Insurance Recovery blog post!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
8 February 2019

The Nickel Report: Texas Supreme Court Holds Anadarko's $100M Deepwater Horizon Defense Costs Are Not Subject To Joint Venture Liability Limits

United States Energy and Natural Resources
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More