Further Developments In Icahn's & Deason's Battle Against Xerox

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Contributor
Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
We previously released an M&A Watch note detailing the recent NY decision of In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation ...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

We previously released an M&A Watch note detailing the recent NY decision of In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation and the subsequent settlement agreement entered into between activist investors Carl Icahn and Darwin Deason and the Xerox Corporation ("Xerox"). The agreement provided for the resignations of Xerox's CEO, Jeff Jacobson, and six other members of Xerox's board, with the newly opened vacancies to be filled by Icahn's and Deason's designees. The agreement was to become effective upon dismissal of the litigation.

In an unexpected and unusual turn of events, the parties were apparently unable to agree on terms dismissing the litigation. It is unclear exactly which terms the parties were unable to agree on, but Icahn alleges in an amendment filed to his Schedule 13D that the "Xerox Board declined to take the actions they unanimously approved as in the best interest of Xerox shareholders unless they obtained additional unprecedented protections from the court, which all parties (and the judge!) agree are not required under applicable law."

As a result, the settlement between the activist investors and Xerox appears to have fallen apart. Jacobson and the Xerox board will remain in their current roles (at least pending further developments). However, the amendment filed to Icahn's Schedule 13D indicates that additional litigation may be forthcoming, as it states that Icahn and Deason intend to see that Jeff Jacobson and the other directors "are held fully and personally liable for their misconduct."

We will continue to monitor this highly unusual situation as it evolves.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Further Developments In Icahn's & Deason's Battle Against Xerox

United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More