An Autodesk settlement agreement contains the typical payment and release language, but sometimes the agreements also contain non-monetary provisions that audit targets must follow.
Autodesk also usually includes a requirement for a company to adopt and maintain a written policy against unauthorized software duplication. Autodesk will provide a sample for a company to adopt and circulate to its employees. Such a policy may obligate a company to enforce disciplinary action upon employees who install unlicensed software on company machines.
Although license verification or audit matters are typically covered in the license agreement, Autodesk often includes additional audit language in the standard agreement.
Another requirement from Autodesk is appearing in some recent proposed settlement agreements: Software Asset Management. When settling an alleged claim of unlicensed use of its software products, Autodesk usually requires the other party to make certain representations and warranties regarding additional actions that a company must take in addition to purchasing licenses from Autodesk. One of the latest requirements is that a company engages an Autodesk-approved third-party Software Asset Management ("SAM") vendor to advise a company on how it acquires Autodesk software and even how it uses the software.
Companies should carefully review the monetary and the non-monetary provisions in the settlement agreement. If a provision is unacceptable, it may be helpful to contact experienced counsel before the parties finalize the settlement agreement.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.