Tenant Harassment And Potential Lender Liability

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
Tenant harassment cases typically involve disputes between landlords and tenants, with rent-stabilized tenants accusing landlords of attempting to bully them into vacating their apartments...
United States Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Tenant harassment cases typically involve disputes between landlords and tenants, with rent-stabilized tenants accusing landlords of attempting to bully them into vacating their apartments by using aggressive tactics such as constant buyout offers, disruptive construction or continued lack of maintenance. Recently, however, concern has been building over how culpable lenders may be when their borrowers engage in harassment to vacate rent-stabilized units, particularly where the loan terms are unsupported by a rent roll consisting of rent-stabilized tenants. Certain lenders, such as Madison Realty Capital, have faced increased scrutiny for what some, including New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, deem predatory lending practices resulting in borrowers being pressured to vacate rent-stabilized apartments by whatever means necessary.

Interestingly, a bill introduced to the New York City Council in June of last year would require the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) to create and maintain a "watch list" of lenders who enable predatory ownership through their financial support. The proposed law would establish a temporary task force to study and recommend criteria to HPD for including lenders on this watch list and would require HPD to (1) publish the list on its website and (2) transmit the list to appropriate regulatory agencies. According to the New York City Council's website, the proposed legislation was referred to the Council's Committee on Housing and Building, where it remains. Tenant advocacy groups, such as Stabilizing NYC, support such measures and have generated lists of "target landlords" claimed to either engage in, or support through financial means, illegal practices against tenants.

Although it is not known whether the bill will be passed (and there is no statutory framework that would explicitly hold a lender liable for providing financial support to an owner), the introduction of the proposed law signals a potential shift in the lender-borrower relationship, whereby lenders may need to exhibit caution in respect of their underwriting of rent-stabilized projects under circumstances in which tenant buyouts are key to the project's economic viability.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More