US Trade Representative Launches 301 Investigation Into China's Shipbuilding Industry

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On April 17, 2024, the Office of the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") announced the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974...
Worldwide International Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On April 17, 2024, the Office of the United States Trade Representative ("USTR") announced the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 regarding allegations that the People's Republic of China ("PRC") has targeted the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sector for dominance and engages in a wide range of unreasonable or discriminatory acts, policies, and practices that provide unfair advantages across those same sectors.

The USTR's initiation is predicated upon a March 12, 2024, petition to the USTR from several US unions (the "petition"). The petition asked the USTR "to address the unreasonable and discriminatory acts, policies, and practices of the [PRC] to dominate the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sector that burden or restrict U.S. Commerce." Section 301 tasks the USTR with enforcing US rights under trade agreements and responding to certain foreign trade practices that are "unjustifiable" or "unreasonable" and burden US commerce.

On April 22, 2024, the USTR also published a summary of the allegations under its investigation, with written comments due on May 22, 2024. These comments include objections by Canadian and European shipowners to the application of port fees to Chinese-built vessels. USTR will also convene a public hearing on May 29, 2024, where it will hear from representatives of the US and China shipbuilding industries.

At the conclusion of the investigation, the USTR will make a final determination. The USTR's final determinations are generally made 12 months after the investigation begins; however, the USTR has indicated the investigation will be completed well before the 12-month timeline. Following the final determination, the USTR may (and in some cases must) decide to take a retaliatory action, in which case it must implement that action within 30 days. Retaliatory actions include (1) imposing duties or other import restrictions, (2) withdrawing or suspending trade-agreement concessions, or (3) entering into a binding agreement with the foreign government to either eliminate the conduct in question (or the burden to US commerce) or compensate the United States with satisfactory trade benefits.1 These actions will terminate after four years, unless the USTR receives a request for continuation and conducts a review of the case.

Specific to this investigation, if the USTR finds China's actions are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden US commerce, it will recommend remedies to the President. The petition's remedies recommendations include (1) a fee on vessels built in China that dock at US ports, (2) the establishment of a shipbuilding revitalization fund with proceeds from that fee, (3) actions to support stronger demand for US-built vessels in light of unfair competition from China, (4) actions to address China's drive to dominate port and logistics infrastructure platforms and equipment, and (5) negotiations with other major shipbuilding countries to address concerns regarding their government support and coordinate measures to address China's unfair practices. If USTR recommend remedies to the President in this case, it remains to be seen how many of these recommendations, if any, would be adopted by the agency.

Interested parties should continue to monitor the investigation as it progresses.

Footnote

1. 19 U.S.C. § 2411.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More