2018 was a busy year for courts deciding insurance coverage disputes. Many of those decisions will shape the coverage landscape for years to come. Policyholders enjoyed their fair share of the wins, including substantial victories in areas involving social engineering to disgorgement of corporate gain. We take this opportunity to reflect on some of the year's most notable coverage decisions.
Social Engineering
2018 was a banner year for decisions addressing losses resulting from social engineering phishing, spoofing and other schemes of trickery and deception.
- 2nd Cir. Affirms Medidata's Spoofing Loss is Covered Under Crime Policy's Computer Fraud Provision. Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 17-cv-2492 (2d Cir. July 6, 2018).
In one of the most closely watched social engineering cases—we blogged about the early stages of this case in 2016 and 2017—the Second Circuit Court affirmed a district court's summary judgment award in favor of Medidata Solutions, Inc., finding that the $4.8 million loss Medidata suffered after it was tricked into wiring funds to a fraudulent overseas account triggered coverage under a commercial crime policy's computer fraud provision. The appellate court found that the entry of data into the computer system squarely satisfied the computer fraud provision, which affords coverage for loss stemming from any "entry of Data into" or "change to Data elements or program logic of" a computer system. The Second Circuit rejected the insurer's argument that Medidata's loss did not actually result directly from the spoofing attack, finding the actions of Medidata's employees "[in]sufficient to sever the casual relationship between the spoofing attack and the losses incurred." The Second Circuit declined Federal's request for reconsideration.
Download >> Year in Review: Top Insurance Cases of 2018
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.