ARTICLE
23 August 2018

Seeing Double? Two Judges, Two Lawsuits, Two Types of Bankruptcy—But a Single Vision for Comity in Cross-Border Insolvencies

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
In this article, published in the August 2018 issue of the American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, George Shuster and Benjamin Loveland discuss a recent decision in In re National Bank of Anguilla that provided an opportunity for the court to explain a coordinated vision for applying international comity principles in cross-border insolvencies.
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In this article, published in the August 2018 issue of the American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, George Shuster and Benjamin Loveland discuss a recent decision in In re National Bank of Anguilla that provided an opportunity for the court to explain a coordinated vision for applying international comity principles in cross-border insolvencies.

Click here to continue reading

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More