SCOTUS Grants Cert To Resolve Split On Sovereign Immunity For Fraudulent Conveyance Claims

TC
Thompson Coburn LLP

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
This morning, the United States Supreme Court granted the U.S. government's certiorari petition in U.S. v. David L. Miller Order List (06/24/2024) (supremecourt.gov).
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This morning, the United States Supreme Court granted the U.S. government's certiorari petition in U.S. v. David L. Miller Order List (06/24/2024) (supremecourt.gov). At issue in the case is whether the United States waived its sovereign immunity with respect to state law fraudulent conveyance claims that are asserted utilizing section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Supreme Court will resolve a circuit split between the Seventh Circuit, which 10 years ago ruled that the government had not waived sovereign immunity for such actions, and the Fourth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits, which all more recently had ruled that the government had expressly waived immunity with respect to such claims.

The outcome of this case will be important to bankruptcy trustees pursuing fraudulent conveyance claims against the U.S. government (such as claims the claims at issue in the underlying case against the IRS), as Section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code only has a two-year look-back period for fraudulent conveyances, while state statutes pursued under Section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code typically have a four-year look-back.

It is anticipated that this case will be argued during the 2024-25 SCOTUS term that commences in October, with a ruling expected before the end of June 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More