ARTICLE
28 August 2018

OIG Seeks Comments To Anti-Kickback Statute And Beneficiary Inducements CMP Related To ‘Patient Centered Care'

CL
Cooley LLP

Contributor

Cooley LLP logo
Clients partner with Cooley on transformative deals, complex IP and regulatory matters, and high-stakes litigation, where innovation meets the law. Cooley has nearly 1,400 lawyers across 18 offices in the United States, Asia and Europe, and a total workforce of more than 3,000.
The Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General published today a request for information seeking ways in which it might modify or add new safe harbors to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute ...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) published today a request for information (RFI) seeking ways in which it might modify or add new safe harbors to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and exceptions to the definition of "remuneration" in the beneficiary inducement provision of the Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP) Law to foster compliant arrangements that promote "efficient, well-coordinated, patient centered care." The RFI is similar to a RFI issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in June 2018 related to the Physician Self-Referral ("Stark") Law. This RFI complements the "Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care" announced recently by HHS.

The OIG has requested comments to the following topics:

  1. Promoting care coordination and value-based care, including (i) potential arrangements that the industry is interested in pursuing related to care coordination, value-based arrangements, alternative payment models, arrangements involving innovative technology, and other novel financial arrangements that may implicate the AKS or CMP Law; (ii) what, if any, additional or modified safe harbors or exceptions to the AKS or CMP Law may be necessary to protect such arrangements and any key provisions that should be included; (iii) how ''value'' could be defined and used in a safe harbor or exception; (iv) thoughts on definitions for critical terminology for such arrangements; and (v) whether there are opportunities for the OIG to clarify its position through guidance as opposed to regulation.
  2. Beneficiary engagement, including input regarding (i) beneficiary incentives provided by providers, suppliers, and others, such as how these incentives would contribute to or improve quality of care, care coordination, and patient engagement and the associated risks or benefits of beneficiary incentives; and (ii) cost-sharing obligations, including how cost-sharing obligations may improve care delivery, enhance value-based arrangements, and quality of care and the associated risks or benefits of waiving cost-sharing obligations.
  3. Experiences from other current fraud and abuse waiver programs.
  4. Input regarding cybersecurity-related items and services.
  5. Input regarding "other conditions" that should be considered when OIG implements the new statutory exception under the ACO Beneficiary Incentive Program through a safe harbor.
  6. Input regarding implementation of a statutory exception in the CMP Law related to certain ''telehealth technologies'' provided on or after January 1, 2019, including applicable protections or safeguards that the OIG should consider.
  7. Input regarding alignment of the Stark Law and AKS, including when the Stark Law exceptions and AKS safe harbors should align, and when Stark Law exceptions related to care coordination or value-based care should not have a corresponding safe harbor to the AKS.

All interested parties should submit comments to the RFI by October 26, 2018. The OIG has urged interested parties that submitted relevant comments to the CMS RFI regarding the Stark Law to resubmit such comments to this RFI.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More