ARTICLE
4 September 2017

CMS Proposes To Cancel Medicare Episode Payment And Cardiac Rehab Incentive Payment Models, And To Cut Back Joint Replacement Model

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On August 17, 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Trump administration published a proposed rule to cancel Medicare's hospital Episode Payment Models (EPMs)...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On August 17, 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Trump administration published a proposed rule to cancel Medicare’s hospital Episode Payment Models (EPMs) and Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) incentive payment models, and to rescind the related Obama-era regulations.  In addition, CMS proposed to revise certain aspects of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model.  The CJR changes would reduce the number of mandatory hospital participants in CJR by approximately 1/2, and create a one-time voluntary option to participate in CJR for hospitals whose participation was mandatory but will become voluntary under the proposed rule.  The opt in will also apply to rural hospitals and low volume hospitals in the MSAs to which CJR applies.

EMPs and CR

CMS had previously established 3 bundled payment models for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, and surgical hip/femur fracture treatment.  As noted, CMS proposes to cancel these models.  CMS concluded, based on stakeholder feedback, that certain aspects of the design of the EPMs and CR incentive payment model should be improved and more fully developed prior to the start of the model, and to start the model as previously scheduled would not be in the interest of providers or beneficiaries.

In 2018, CMS expects to develop new, voluntary bundled payment models in which providers may elect to participate.  Those models would be designed to meet the criteria to be Advanced Alternative Payment Models.  Hospitals should monitor the CMS Center for Innovation regarding the proposal of these new models.

CJR

CMS is proposing that the CJR model would continue on a mandatory basis in approximately 1/2 of the originally selected MSAs (that is, 34 of the 67 selected areas) with an exception for low volume and rural hospitals, and continue on a voluntary basis in the other areas (that is, 33 of the 67 areas).  The mandatory and voluntary MSAs are listed in the August 17, 2017 Federal Register at pages 39315-39316.  Low volume and rural hospitals, and hospitals located in a voluntary MSA, may opt in to CJR on a one-time bases from January 1, 2018 through January 31, 2018.  Hospitals for which CJR participation is no longer mandatory (as well as rural and low volume hospital) should assess, between now and January, 2018, whether it is advantageous to opt in to CJR.

Comments to the proposed rule are due by October 16, 2017.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More