EHR Vendor To Pay $155 Million To Settle False Claims Act Allegations

DP
Day Pitney LLP

Contributor

Day Pitney LLP logo
Day Pitney LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 300 attorneys in Boston, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Washington, DC. The firm offers clients strong corporate and litigation practices, with experience on behalf of large national and international corporations as well as emerging and middle-market companies. With one of the largest individual clients practices on the East Coast, the firm also has extensive experience assisting individuals and their families, fiduciaries and tax-exempt entities plan for the future.
Massachusetts-based electronic health records (EHR) vendor eClinicalWorks (ECW) and several of its employees will pay nearly $155 million to settle allegations that it violated federal law...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Massachusetts-based electronic health records (EHR) vendor eClinicalWorks (ECW) and several of its employees will pay nearly $155 million to settle allegations that it violated federal law by misrepresenting its software's capabilities and paying kickbacks to customers. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the settlement with ECW, one of the largest ECR vendors in the U.S., on May 31.

The settlement resolves a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower under the False Claims Act, as well as allegations that ECW paid kickbacks to customers in exchange for promoting its product. The whistleblower will personally receive about $30 million out of the settlement.

Under the Electronic Health Records Incentive Program to encourage healthcare providers to adopt and demonstrate "meaningful use" of EHR certified technology, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) offers incentive payments to healthcare providers that adopt EHRs and meet certain requirements regarding their use. EHR vendors obtain certification for their products by attesting that the products satisfy specific criteria adopted by HHS and pass testing by an HHS-approved certifying entity.

HHS's complaint-in-intervention alleged that "ECW falsely obtained certification for its EHR software when it concealed from its certifying entity that its software did not comply with the requirements for certification. For example, in order to pass certification testing without meeting the certification criteria for standardized drug codes, the company modified its software by "hardcoding" only the drug codes required for testing. In other words, rather than programming the capability to retrieve any drug code from a complete database, ECW simply typed the 16 codes necessary for certification testing directly into its software. ECW's software also did not accurately record user actions in an audit log and in certain situations did not reliably record diagnostic imaging orders or perform drug interaction checks."

By misrepresenting its software's capabilities, ECW caused providers to submit false "meaningful use" incentive payment claims, making the False Claims Act applicable. In addition, ECW allegedly paid customers up to $500 each to recommend its software to potential customers, which violated the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.

In the settlement, ECW and three of its founders will be jointly and severally liable for the payment of $154.92 million to the federal government and three other company employees will pay a total of $80,000. ECW also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement imposing numerous ongoing obligations regarding to the quality control, marketing, and capabilities of its EHR software.


For more articles and regular updates on legislative changes, regulatory developments and other news of interest to businesses, professionals and investors in the healthcare industry, please subscribe to Day Pitney's mailing lists.


Click here for more Healthcare Blogs from Day Pitney

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More