ARTICLE
9 December 2015

It's About Time (But Not Quite Yet)

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
When misconduct occurs within an organization, it is often reported and interpreted as an anecdote involving a few rogue employees who are quickly identified and appropriately disciplined.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The comment period for the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) regarding proposed changes to the Human Subjects Protection "Common Rule" issued by 16 federal departments and agencies in September has been extended an additional 30 days to January 6, 2016. Only the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has received any comments on the NPRM to date. Most of these comments are brief requests for more time to review the changes, given the sheer volume and impact of the proposals. More substantive comments were submitted by prominent research organizations, including the American Society for Investigative Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, the American Society of Microbiology, and others, expressing concern that redefining "Human Subject" to include biospecimens may stifle research breakthroughs by requiring significant expenditures of time and resources, often creating a disproportional impact on small community and minority-serving institutions. Many comments were also submitted by individuals impacted by rare cancers, voicing similar concern that including biospecimens as "Human Subjects" would make accessing research materials and treatment breakthroughs that much more unlikely.

It is encouraging that industry leaders and community members have started evaluating the NPRM and its effect on clinical research. The deadline extension likely will result in additional meaningful discussion that will allow HHS and other federal departments to craft a final rule that meets the NPRM's stated goal to "modernize, strengthen, and make more effective the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects." We would be happy to assist you if you would like to prepare a comment on the NPRM during the extended comment period.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More