ARTICLE
21 February 2022

January 2022 Changes To The Stark Law That Impact Group-Practice Physician Compensation

W
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
At the beginning of the year, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued new Stark Law regulations that affect how physician practices may share profits and that clarify how they may pay productivity bonuses.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

At the beginning of the year, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued new Stark Law regulations that affect how physician practices may share profits and that clarify how they may pay productivity bonuses. These regulations were promulgated to address undue regulatory burdens imposed by the former rules, to support healthcare innovation and, most notably, to promote value-based arrangements (i.e., arrangements promoting quality care and cost-effective treatments) over a volume-based system (i.e., one that compensates physicians based on the number of services provided). The Stark Law generally prohibits physicians from referring certain health services payable by Medicare to an entity they have a financial relationship with, unless an exception applies.

The most recent amendments were effective starting January 1, 2022. Those amendments clarify and modify methods by which group-practice physicians may be compensated in two main ways.

First, the amendments clarify that physician groups may pay productivity bonuses based on (1) services a physician has personally performed or (2) services incident to those services the physician personally performed. Productivity bonuses may not directly consider the volume or value of referrals made by a physician, unless they concern referrals for services incident to services the physician personally performed. See C.F.R. § 411.352(i)(2). Comments to the amendments noted specific types of productivity bonuses that are permissible:

  • A productivity bonus based solely on services personally performed by the physician;
  • A productivity bonus based solely on services performed by a member of the physician's care team that are not designated health services; and
  • A productivity bonus based solely on designated health services ordered by the physician and provided by members of the physician's care team incident to the physician's billed Medicare services. See Medicare Program; Modernizing and Clarifying the Physician Self-Referral Regulations, 85 Fed. Reg. 77,566-67 (Dec. 2, 2020). 

Second, the amendments modify bonus and profit-sharing rules in value-based enterprises. Historically, productivity bonuses or profit sharing to group-practice physicians that directly considered the volume or value of their referrals to the group practice was prohibited, unless an exception (e.g., the Shared Savings Program) applied. The Stark Law now allows profits from designated health services that are directly attributable to a physician's participation in a value-based enterprise to be distributed to that physician; this compensation will not be deemed to directly relate to the volume or value of the physician's referrals. See C.F.R. § 411.352(i)(3); Medicare Program; Modernizing and Clarifying the Physician Self-Referral Regulations, 85 Fed. Reg. 77,559 (Dec. 2, 2020). This shift is intended to further a transition away from a volume-based healthcare system and toward a value-based healthcare system and associated new payment models. 

These amendments are now effective, so healthcare providers and physician practices should evaluate their current policies regarding productivity bonuses and profit sharing to ensure Stark Law compliance. As noted, these changes are part of a broader shift to promoting value-based arrangements, suggesting further changes in this area may continue to unfold.


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
21 February 2022

January 2022 Changes To The Stark Law That Impact Group-Practice Physician Compensation

United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Contributor
WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More