ACCC 47th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit (AMCCBS): Positive Disruption In The COVID-19 ERA – Part 2

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
The ACCC 47th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit (AMCCBS) took place virtually, March 1-5. Through a combination of five-star panels and interactive drop-in sessions, attendees learned...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The ACCC 47th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit (AMCCBS) took place virtually, March 1-5. Through a combination of five-star panels and interactive drop-in sessions, attendees learned about key themes and trends in oncology today: telemedicine/telehealth, virtual care models and remote monitoring, including home therapy for chemo; cancer service line efficiency and revenue optimization; leveraging data; managing alternative payment models; employer-driven models and addressing disparities in cancer care; long-and short-term impacts of Covid-19 on oncology; clinical research; and current trends and the changing landscape in oncology transactions.

You can also review our additional AMCCBS focused blogs on "Moving Forward Under the Biden Administration" by clicking the available link.

Change is the Only Constant: The 2021 "Level Set" in the Sprint to Value-Based Care

Foley Partner Adria Warren, in partnership with Tynan Kugler (Principal at PYA, P.C.), discussed the new flexibilities introduced in the major overhaul of the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute in 2021, and presented key highlights of the regulatory framework under the final rules. These new rules for the first time permit collaboration to advance the adoption of value-based care, introducing important Stark Law exceptions (and comparable Anti-Kickback safe harbors) for so-called "value-based arrangements." There are three new exceptions (safe harbors) involving remuneration paid under a value-based arrangement with full financial risk, meaningful (substantial) downside risk, and value-based (or care coordination) arrangements. Each model has a variety of technical requirements, which have been discussed in a prior Health Care Law Today  blog. Importantly, the requirements do not always line up across the two statutory frameworks. At a very high level, the more risk that is assumed by the participants to a value-based arrangement, the more flexibility the exceptions/safe harbors allow. The 2021 Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute revisions also updated the regulatory framework for donations of electronic health records, finalized a new exception/safe harbor for cybersecurity, and provided many important clarifications and explanations, including updates to the concepts of "fair market value" (FMV) and "commercial reasonableness" (CR) as applied to health care transactions. Ms. Kugler noted that the new rules have debunked many myths surrounding FMV and CR.

Among the many tidbits speakers highlighted was CMS' clarified position that benchmark data is not necessarily determinative of fair market value: "It appears...that stakeholders may have been under the impression that it is CMS policy that reliance on salary surveys will result, in all cases, in a determination of fair market value...the FMV of a transaction...may not always align with published valuation data compilations, such as salary surveys." She also pointed out that, in CMS' view, arrangements could still potentially be commercially reasonable even if they are not profitable. In the new Stark rules, CMS cites examples of non-profitable arrangements including those that meet community care, fulfill licensure/regulatory obligations, and others. Profitability is still relevant, but, according to CMS' final rule, "we are not convinced that the profitability of an arrangement is completely irrelevant or always unrelated to the determination of CR."

It is important to remember that FMV and CR remain "facts and circumstances" specific, and FMV could fall above or below survey data based on qualitative and quantitative considerations.  Continued regulatory evolution to promote care coordination and value-based reimbursement is not only expected, but ensured.

The speakers offered a number of practical tips including a need to actively monitor how compensation arrangements are implemented in light of changes to the "period of disallowance" (POD) provisions and reconciliation rules.

After a successful virtual conference, the ACCC 48th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit is planning to be held in person in Washington, D.C. in March 2022!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More