ARTICLE
10 November 2020

340B Entities Sue HHS Over Lack Of Dispute Resolution Process

Three organizations serving primarily HIV and AIDS patients and who each are also considered "Covered Entities" under the 340B Drug Pricing Program (the Plaintiffs)
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Three organizations serving primarily HIV and AIDS patients and who each are also considered "Covered Entities" under the 340B Drug Pricing Program (the Plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit against Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar and the Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Administrator Thomas Engels (the Defendants) on October 9, 2020, seeking to compel action by their respective agencies.

The complaint alleges that the Defendants' failure to promulgate final regulations related to a formal dispute resolution process for the 340B Drug Pricing Program has damaged Plaintiffs and has encouraged pharmaceutical manufacturers to engage in practices contrary to agency guidance. Specifically, the Plaintiffs allege that some manufacturers are refusing to sell heavily discounted 340B drugs to Covered Entities that utilize contract pharmacies, despite HRSA guidance affirming the right and ability of Covered Entities to use contract pharmacies to dispense 340B drugs to qualifying patients.

Interestingly, the complaint is not focused on declaratory relief instructing HRSA to finalize regulations governing the dispute resolution process, but seeks a declaratory judgment that the Plaintiffs are entitled to purchase and dispense 340B drugs through contract pharmacies. The practice of purchasing and dispensing 340B drugs through contract pharmacies is not specifically authorized under the 340B statute or final agency regulations, but rather is a practice only discussed in HRSA guidance. In addition, it is not entirely clear how the relief sought by the Plaintiffs is related to HRSA's failure to finalize regulations governing the dispute resolution process. The Plaintiffs also claim damages for violation of due process rights by the Defendants' failure to promulgate final dispute resolution regulations and seek other relief related to violations of the Administrative Procedures Act.

This lawsuit is yet another action calling into focus the issues that have beleaguered the 340B Drug Pricing Program for many years. Arent Fox will continue to monitor the case.

Originally Published By Arent Fox, November 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
10 November 2020

340B Entities Sue HHS Over Lack Of Dispute Resolution Process

United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More