ARTICLE
21 February 2018

SEC Releases Guidance On Certain Implications For Research Payment Arrangements Involving MiFID II Regulated Firms

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
On 26 October 2017, the SEC issued guidance to address certain extraterritorial issues under MiFID II, Europe's new financial regulation for investment business, which came into effect on 3 January 2018.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 26 October 2017, the SEC issued guidance to address certain extraterritorial issues under MiFID II, Europe's new financial regulation for investment business, which came into effect on 3 January 2018. One of MiFID II's aims is to give investors transparency into the cost of both research and trading commissions, by requiring payments for these elements to be unbundled.

In particular, the Staff of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance (the "Staff") issued three no-action letters, designed to address concerns from U.S. broker-dealers and investment advisers regarding their need to charge for research in the manner required by their European clients under MiFID II. The Staff stated that they would grant relief under the following circumstances:

  • The Staff would not recommend enforcement actions against an investment adviser that aggregates orders for the sale or purchase of securities on behalf of its clients in reliance on the position taken in the prior no-action letter for SMC Capital1 while accommodating the differing arrangements regarding the payment for research that are required by MiFID II.
  • The Staff will not recommend enforcement action if a broker-dealer provides research services that constitute "investment advice" under section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act to an investment manager that is required to pay for the research services by using research payments under MiFID II. The relief is time limited to 30 months from MiFID II's implementation on 3 January 2018.
  • The Staff will not recommend enforcement action against a money manager seeking to operate in reliance on Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act if it pays for research through the use of a "Research Payment Account" and conforms to the requirements for "Research Payment Account" in MiFID II, provided that all other applicable conditions of Section 28(e) are met.

Our related client publication is available at:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More