Federal Circuit: A Biosimilar Applicant Must Provide Notice Of Intent To Market A Biosimilar Product, No Exceptions

F
Fenwick

Contributor

Fenwick logo
Fenwick provides comprehensive legal services to leading technology and life sciences companies — at every stage of their lifecycle — and the investors that partner with them. For more than four decades, Fenwick has helped some of the world's most recognized companies become and remain market leaders. Visit fenwick.com to learn more.
Notably, the Federal Circuit took the opportunity to defend its previous holding in Amgen v. Sandoz that notice of intent to commercially market cannot be provided until the FDA approves the biosimilar product.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On July 5, 2016, in Amgen v. Apotex (No. 2016-1308), the Federal Circuit again held that a biosimilar applicant must provide its biologic competitor with 180 days' notice of intent to commercially market a biosimilar product. This time, however, the court elaborated that such notice is required even if a biosimilar applicant fully participated in the BPCIA's so-called "patent dance," the statutory-based information exchange process designed to narrow the inevitable patent disputes between biologic and biosimilar competitors. 

Notably, the Federal Circuit took the opportunity to defend its previous holding in Amgen v. Sandoz that notice of intent to commercially market cannot be provided until the FDA approves the biosimilar product. In the wake of criticisms raised by Sandoz and various amici in certiorari briefing, the Federal Circuit suggested that its holding does not effectively extend the twelve-year biologic exclusivity period because the FDA may be able to tentatively license a biosimilar product any time after the application is submitted (i.e., at least six months before the end of the exclusivity period). But whether the FDA has the statutory authority to issue such tentative licenses or, even if it does, whether the FDA must do so, has yet to be litigated.

More information on the Federal Circuit's Amgen v. Apotex decision, and its relationship to the Amgen v. Sandoz certiorari petitions currently before the Supreme Court, can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More