ARTICLE
28 April 2016

Federal Court: CFPB Lacked Jurisdiction To Issue CID

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
In 2015, the CFPB issued a CID to ACICS, an accreditor of for-profit colleges. The stated purpose of the CID was to investigate whether any entity has or is violating federal consumer protection laws...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Anthony E. DiResta and Kwamina Thomas Williford are partners and Brian Goodrich is an Associate in our Washington, D.C. office.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on April 21, 2016 found that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) did not have authority to issue a Civil Investigation Demand (CID) in an investigation aimed at business practices that did not involve a consumer financial product or service. The court announced this finding in its ruling that the CFPB did not have the authority to issue a CID to the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS).

In 2015, the CFPB issued a CID to ACICS, an accreditor of for-profit colleges. The stated purpose of the CID was to investigate whether any entity has or is violating federal consumer protection laws in connection with accrediting for-profit colleges. ACICS refused to comply with the CID and submitted a petition to the CFPB to set aside the CID. CFCB Director Richard Cordray denied the ACICS petition, and when ACICS continued to refuse to comply, the CFPB brought suit in federal district court to enforce the CID.

The court denied the CFPB's petition, dismissing the argument that the CFPB's authority to investigate private colleges' lending practices extended to the accreditation process. The court also dismissed the CFPB's argument that it is entitled to investigate and determine for itself whether or not ACICS is engaged in accreditation activities that lie outside of the CFPB's jurisdiction. For a greater discussion of this ruling and its backdrop, please see Holland & Knight's client alert.

This decision is the first time the CFPB's enforcement authority has been reined in by a court, and it follow the oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit earlier this month, during which the constitutionality of the Bureau was questioned.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools, Civil Case No. 15-1838 (D.D.C. April 21, 2016)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More