The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore. The Court is considering a circuit split to determine if a spousal guarantor is an "applicant" protected by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). At issue is Regulation B which interpreted the ECOA's definition of "applicant" to include a spouse-guarantor. The question is should the term "applicant" include the person who is not directly applying for a loan. Chief Justice Roberts, along with Justices Alito and Scalia, focused on the plain meaning of the term "applicant" which would preclude the need to give deference to Regulation B. The questions from Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg suggested a willingness to consider the term ambiguous and in need of further explanation bythe CFPB, the agency tasked with overseeing the ECOA.Sixth Circuit precedentgrants deference to the CFPB and applies Regulation B. The Eighth Circuit does not. Until the Court decides Hawkins, creditors should be wary of an unexpected ECOA violation being raised by a spouse-guarantor.
For a discussion of the circuit split and the issues in this case, please see "Until Debt Do Us Part: Eighth Circuit Creates Split on Violation of ECOA for Spousal Guaranties," with Richard A. Vance, The Banking Law Journal, September 2015. The briefing in this case is available here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.