ARTICLE
13 August 2015

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Levies Repayment, Civil Fines For Deceptive Mortgage Practices

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On Tuesday, July 28, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Paymap Inc., a Colorado-based payment processing company and wholly owned subsidiary of Western Union Company, to repay consumers $33.4 million...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Tuesday, July 28, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Paymap Inc., a Colorado-based payment processing company and wholly owned subsidiary of Western Union Company, to repay consumers $33.4 million in fees and levied a $5 million civil penalty for violating a prohibition against unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices. The Bureau also ordered LoanCare, LLC, a Virginia-based mortgage servicer, to pay a $100,000 civil penalty for its role in the customer deception.

Both parties' violations stem from their respective roles in a program called the Equity Accelerator Program (the "Program"), which allowed customers to make electronic payments on their mortgages and allegedly achieve a substantial savings from their regular mode of payment. Enrollees in the Program permitted Paymap to deduct a portion of their monthly mortgage payment from their bank account weekly, biweekly, or semi-monthly. For doing so, Paymap promised customers they would save money over the life of their mortgage because of the increased frequency of the payments. In fact, on Paymap's website, it stated that "[t]he average customer will achieve over $33,000 in interest savings" and that "[m]ost homeowners save over $33,000 in interest payments." For this service, customers were charged an enrollment fee of $295 and a transaction fee of $2.50 for each payment.

The Program, however, did not operate as advertised. Although Paymap charged customers a transaction fee with each withdrawal, Paymap did not actually transfer customers' payments to the servicer when payments were debited from their account. Instead, Paymap held customers' payments in a custodial account until the beginning of the month that the customer's next mortgage payment was due and then transferred the funds to the servicer. The Program used the exact same payment schedule as the customer was originally using, and any interest savings a customer achieved was simply a result of the customer making a higher annual payment in the Program.

Though LoanCare did not administer the Program, its role was also deceptive. LoanCare partnered with Paymap to enroll LoanCare customers in the Program by gathering personal financial information on LoanCare customers and mailing solicitations to these customers on LoanCare letterhead. It also advertised the Program on its website.

The CFPB concluded that Paymap and LoanCare's actions  violated the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's prohibition against unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices. They did so by misleading customers about when their mortgage payments would be applied and promising substantial savings to customers without factual basis to support the claim. 12 U.S.C. 5536(a)(1)(B).

Along with the monetary penalties and fines, the orders prohibit Paymap or LoanCare from advertising the Program without credible evidence to support their claims, or from implying that the Program itself will change the payment schedule of a mortgage.

In the orders, neither party admitted or denied allegations that they violated the Dodd-Frank Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More