ARTICLE
17 December 2020

New York Appellate Court Holds Lender's Mortgage Was Not Reinstated After Borrowers Bought Property Back From City After Tax Foreclosure

RD
Riker Danzig LLP
Contributor
Riker Danzig LLP has served the business community for 140 years, with offices in Morristown and Trenton, New Jersey and in Midtown Manhattan. Riker Danzig is regional counsel, national defense counsel, and deal counsel to clients ranging from Fortune 500 corporations to middle-market businesses.
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, recently held that a tax sale foreclosure extinguished a mortgage on a property and, more important, the mortgage was not reinstated when...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, recently held that a tax sale foreclosure extinguished a mortgage on a property and, more important, the mortgage was not reinstated when the City later quitclaimed the property back to the borrowers as part of the borrowers' bankruptcy action. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Tr. for Carrington Mortg. Loan Tr., Series 2006-NC2 Asset- Backed Pass-Through Certificates v. Budram, 188 A.D.3d 1324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).  In 2006, defendants purchased a property and encumbered it with a mortgage that later was assigned to plaintiff.  Defendant later defaulted, and plaintiff brought this foreclosure action and moved for summary judgment in July 2014.  In August 2014, the City acquired title to the property via a tax foreclosure.  A few days later, defendants filed for bankruptcy, staying plaintiff's foreclosure action.  At the close of the bankruptcy proceeding, the City quitclaimed the property back to defendants.  Plaintiff then asked the trial court to decide its pending summary judgment motion.  Defendants opposed, arguing that the mortgage was extinguished as part of the tax sale and that plaintiff's action was moot.  The trial court agreed that the mortgage was extinguished and dismissed the action.

On appeal, the Court affirmed. The Court found that the tax sale foreclosure extinguished plaintiff's lien on the property pursuant to RPTL 1136.  In doing so, the Court rejected plaintiff's argument that defendants had redeemed the property, finding instead that defendants did not pay the required amount by the redemption date, and that "[a]ny transfer of the property from the City back to defendants after the execution of a tax deed to the City cannot be considered a redemption of the property, nor was it a rescission of the tax foreclosure."  Accordingly, the mortgage was extinguished and this action was properly dismissed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
17 December 2020

New York Appellate Court Holds Lender's Mortgage Was Not Reinstated After Borrowers Bought Property Back From City After Tax Foreclosure

United States Finance and Banking
Contributor
Riker Danzig LLP has served the business community for 140 years, with offices in Morristown and Trenton, New Jersey and in Midtown Manhattan. Riker Danzig is regional counsel, national defense counsel, and deal counsel to clients ranging from Fortune 500 corporations to middle-market businesses.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More