Justices Agree To Review San Francisco's Challenge To EPA's CWA Limits

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Environmental Law Chair Jeff Porter was featured in Inside EPA's breaking news that the United States Supreme Court has decided to hear a third Clean Water Act case in just over four years.
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Environmental Law Chair Jeff Porter was featured in Inside EPA's breaking news that the United States Supreme Court has decided to hear a third Clean Water Act case in just over four years.

This case is an appeal by the City and County of San Francisco of a split Ninth Circuit decision upholding an EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit with so-called narrative standards.

Jeff, who had predicted in February that the Supreme Court would take this case, tells Inside EPA that "the Supreme Court is going to find in San Francisco's favor, striking down or at least severely limiting EPA's longstanding practice of [including permit conditions prohibiting discharges that 'cause or contribute to violations of applicable water quality standards']."

SOURCE

Inside EPA

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More