ARTICLE
16 August 2019

Amendment To New York State Election Law For Time Off To Vote

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
In April, the New York State Election Law was amended to provide that New York state employees who are registered voters may, without loss of pay for up to three hours, take off so much working time...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In April, the New York State Election Law was amended to provide that New York state employees who are registered voters may, without loss of pay for up to three hours, take off so much working time as will enable them to vote in any election. Previously, the Election Law provided that an employee was entitled to time off to vote only if he or she did not have four consecutive hours in which to vote between the opening of the polls and the start of the employee's work shift, or the end of the employee's shift and the closing of the polls. Furthermore, an employers' pay obligation was limited to only two hours. This is no longer the case.

The opinion letter is much more business-friendly than were previous letters issued under the prior administration, and it provides a checklist of factors for employers to consider in structuring contractor arrangements. It also provides peace of mind to employers in the gig economy platform space and offers them protections under the Portal-to-Portal Act, which protects from liability businesses that rely in good faith on the DOL's interpretations.

In a similar vein, the National Labor Relations Board's General Counsel's Office recently concluded in an advisory memo that Uber drivers are not legal employees for the purposes of federal labor laws, meaning they cannot form or join a union. The office concluded that Uber's business model avoids the control of drivers traditionally associated with such systems and affords drivers significant entrepreneurial opportunity. In issuing the memo, the office relied on a recent decision in the SuperShuttle DFW case, which established a new test based on "entrepreneurial opportunity" and consideration of at least 10 factors relevant to an employment relationship.

Notwithstanding recent pro-business federal guidance on the issue, several states maintain their own tests for the employee versus contractor classification, which often differ from federal standards, only adding to the uncertainty in this area of the law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More