Cleveland Attorneys Recommend Ways To Comply With Union U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

FP
Fisher Phillips LLP

Contributor

Fisher Phillips LLP logo
Fisher Phillips LLP is a national law firm committed to providing practical business solutions for employers’ workplace legal problems. Labor and employment law is all the firm does, offering deep and broad knowledge and experience in the area of the law the attorneys know best. Fisher Phillips attorneys help clients avoid legal problems, are dedicated to providing exceptional client service, and are there when you need them. The firm has over 400 attorneys in 34 offices with 33 locations. Learn more at www.fisherphillips.com.
William Blackie and Sarah Moore authored the Crain's Cleveland Business article "U.S. Supreme Court Strikes a Massive Blow Against the National Labor Movement."
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

William Blackie and Sarah Moore authored the Crain's Cleveland Business article "U.S. Supreme Court Strikes a Massive Blow Against the National Labor Movement." This article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME prohibiting public-sector employers from collecting "fair share" fees from non-union employees. "Fair Share" fees are paid by those public sector employees who choose not to belong to a union, but are part of a bargaining unit, and covered by a collective bargaining agreement, for which the union is the exclusive representative.

In the 5-4 decision, the court ruled that requiring bargaining unit employees to pay agency fees to a union violated the First Amendment, which prohibits both states and public sector unions from taking agency fees from "nonconsenting" employees.

In order to comply with this new ruling, William and Sarah suggest that:

  • Each public employer in Ohio immediately cease processing any fair share deductions
  • Each public employer should meet with business representatives of the unions with which it holds collective bargaining agreements to confirm implementation of the Janus decision
  • Each public employer should review the list of current union members for whom regular dues deductions are being made, and request written confirmation from the union of each employee's affirmative consent to membership
  • If a union demands bargaining based on the Janus decision, the employer should review the demand with counsel

To read the full article, visit Crain's Cleveland Business.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More