ARTICLE
21 February 2018

California As A Sanctuary State: Restrictions On Employers' Compliance With Federal Immigration Actions

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
In October 2017, California passed the widely publicized Senate Bill 54, the unofficial "sanctuary state" bill, which bars state and local law enforcement agencies from asking people about their immigration status.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In October 2017, California passed the widely publicized Senate Bill 54, the unofficial "sanctuary state" bill, which bars state and local law enforcement agencies from asking people about their immigration status. Another new California law, the Immigrant Worker Protection Act (Assembly Bill 450), effective January 1, 2018, provides worksite immigration protection for employees while on the job.

Pursuant to AB 450, all public and private employers in California are prohibited from:

(1) providing federal immigration enforcement agents access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant;

(2) providing agents access to employee records without a subpoena or judicial warrant; and

(3) reverifying an employee's eligibility to work unless specifically required by federal statutory law.

The exceptions to this prohibition are Form I-9 employment eligibility verification forms and instances where federal law requires employers to provide access to records.

An employer that fails to follow notice requirements can be fined between $2,000 and $5,000 for a first violation and between $5,000 and $10,000 for each subsequent violation.

Notice to Employees

AB 450 also requires employers post a notice to all current employees informing them of any federal immigration agency's inspections of Form I-9 or other employment records within 72 hours of receiving a Notice of Inspection. Employers must also provide a copy of the Notice of Inspection to an affected employee upon reasonable request. The notice must contain the name of the agency conducting the inspection, the date the employer received notice of the inspection, the nature of the inspection (if known), and a copy of the official "Notice of Inspection" provided by the immigration agency. The notice must be posted in the language normally used to communicate with employees.

Once the inspection is over, within 72 hours of receiving the results, employers must give each affected employee a copy of the inspection results and written notice of the employer's and employee's obligations arising from the inspection within 72 hours of receiving the results. The California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement has provided a template of the notice to employees advising them of an inspection by immigration agencies.

Reverifying Employment Eligibility

AB 450 also explicitly forbids employers from reverifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by 8 U.S.C § 1324a(b). Doing so can result in a penalty of up to $10,000 per violation.

Practical Steps for California Employers

It remains to be seen the full impact the imposition of AB 450 will have on public and private employers in California and their interaction with federal immigration enforcement agents. California employers would be wise to take measures to ensure compliance in the face of the new law by considering the following:

  • Training managers to ask immigration agents for judicial warrants and subpoenas
  • Training managers to comply with new posting and notice requirements as well as post-inspection notice requirements
  • Training Human Resources on when it is appropriate to reverify employees' employment eligibility status and to ensure that no reverification of current employees occurs before it is required by federal law

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More